EntryAtlas
Check a journey

Ranking methodology · EntryAtlas Insights

Why passport rankings can disagree without either table being ‘wrong’

Two passport indexes can use similar visa-access data and still produce different scores, ties and positions because their destinations, scoring rules and update cycles are not identical.

Reviewed 12th August 20265 min read

Start with what the index actually counts

Arton Capital describes its Passport Index Mobility Score as a total built from visa-free, visa-on-arrival, eTA and qualifying fast eVisa access. Henley counts destinations accessible without a prior visa and bases its index on IATA data plus in-house research.

Those definitions overlap, but they are not a promise that every index treats every electronic permission, territory or edge case in the same way.

The destination universe matters

A ranking based on a different number of destinations can produce a different score even when the underlying travel relationships are broadly similar. Tie-breaking and treatment of territories can also affect the visible rank number.

That is why EntryAtlas keeps a source-labelled ranking snapshot separate from its own bundled Passport Power discovery dataset.

Use rank as a comparison lens, not a travel rule

A global position is useful for comparing broad mobility. It does not answer whether one traveller can enter one destination today, for one purpose, on one passport.

For a real journey, move from the ranking to the passport profile, destination guide and official source.

Quick answers

Common questions.

Why can the same passport have a different rank on two websites?

Indexes can use different destination sets, scoring categories, update dates and tie methods. Compare the methodology and data date before comparing the rank number.

Is an EntryAtlas dataset position the same as an external passport ranking?

No. EntryAtlas labels its bundled Passport Power position separately from the dated external ranking snapshot.